Maybe I don't understand your question well, thus my answers are not to the point, but I sincerely hope you are not confusing yourself. However, by increasing the thickness for the latter two, the 10' height can also achieved for the masonry and block walls. For example, for a constant wall thickness, the concrete wall can be 10' tall, but be 8' for masonry, and 6' or less using dry blocks. Gravity retaining walls’ long-lasting and exceptional strength protects and optimizes functional property space. However the lack of bond strength is made up by limiting the height of wall, and making the wall more massive. A gravity retaining wall exclusively uses the mass of its large interlocking concrete blocks to effectively retain soil loads from above and behind the wall. The bond is an important factor in retaining wall design. The whole point of the design of the SRW is thus to avoid the two failure mode with self weight of the blocks, and with the assistance of tiebacks (if necessary).

Rotation will occur under two conditions - sliding is prevented by shear friction (µW), and the resultant force falls outside of the pivot point. The first deals with the size of the habitat inducing the artificial. Rotation will not occur, if it is allowed to slide. There are two major design considerations when making an artificial gravity system that would eliminate those health problems.

A rigid body subjected to a horizontal load will have two failure mode - sliding and rotation. You are asking the rotation potential of a 'rigid body', that does not posses plastic behavior. For steelwork, plastic deformation is accepted and documented as a design model.

Gravity design